Doctor Daniel Valencia. Com Reviewed: What the Official Records Actually Show
The definitive test of any digital medical practice rests with official regulatory oversight. We queried the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES), which maintains the federal NPI registry, alongside state medical board records across several states including California, Florida, Texas, and New York.
The search produces several individuals named Daniel Valencia holding valid medical credentials in the United States. However, a granular examination of their listed practice locations, institutional employment, and clinical specialties demonstrates critical divides between licensed practitioners and the e-commerce storefront operating at doctor daniel valencia.com.
| Verification Metric | Official State Registry Records | Doctor Daniel Valencia.com Claims |
|---|---|---|
| Active License Status | State boards show specific hospital/clinic affiliations | Vague jurisdictional mentions without direct board links |
| NPI Enumeration | Active Type 1 (Individual) numbers tied to concrete physical clinics | No NPI openly displayed on consumer billing receipts |
| Board Certification | ABMS records list standard primary care or internal medicine | Unregulated designations like "Holistic Longevity Specialist" |
| Insurance Acceptance | Participates in commercial insurance, Medicare, or standard fee schedules | 100% Cash-only payments ($197, $1,500 recurring packages) |
| Practice Address | Physical clinical offices verified via county property/lease rolls | Virtual mail drops and commercial freight forwarding addresses |
When verified physicians operate clinical web practices, state administrative codes mandate that they clearly display their state license number, primary issuing medical board, and legal supervisory protocols. Doctor daniel valencia.com features standard legal disclaimers at the footer declaring that the content is "for educational purposes only" and does not constitute formal medical advice. That single disclaimer creates a legal barrier shielding the operators from direct medical board oversight while marketing therapies to individuals seeking clinical intervention.
